Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
這檔製作大概是看好胖Amy及YA校園喜劇的結合吧，但她變瘦了會不會不那麼討喜了？而喜歡青春喜劇的……這又不是，真尷尬了 XD 比較驚豔的是從 Happiest Season後再見到Mary Holland及Easttown Mare後再見到可愛的Angourie Rice (原來她也是澳洲人阿! 酷)!
真的很土很狗血 但是能够给我带来快乐和力量 我愿意给出很好的评价😀
给我们自信和爱的永远都是我们不会留意的人，不要让他们受伤，去发现他们在心里的位置。
就喜欢看美国青春无脑电影 虽然后面的剧情突然就很怪 人物性格转变太快 但我还是很爱看
剧情都很简单且套路，都能猜到，不过本来就是个简单的喜剧，制作感觉还跟十几年前一样，不过看在女主满墙的布兰妮海报和致敬了crzay的面子上多一星吧。
老套 无聊 结尾有点可爱 但昏迷了20年是怎么能马上起床走路的、、😥
无论几岁，都需要给缺失的部分一个交代。不然可能不需要一场脑死亡，你也会永远停在那个年纪（或者毁掉自己）
啦啦队表演真的好青春呀/女主每次花式比fuck又酷又好笑哈哈哈哈
真的对美国高中拉拉队文化无感，但是看到年轻人自信展现自己的身体和自我还是很值得称赞的
够了的前提是得到 bty很羡慕他们快四十还能毫无压力回高中的无年龄焦虑的氛围
题材挺新颖的，就是剧情跳的有些快，不太连贯，难以带入女主的角度
尬舞挺欢乐的，讽刺了下矫枉过正的政治正确，看个热闹不管逻辑就还好
我14-16岁期间最喜欢的一种电影类型 现在看也很开心
意外的还不错 Ps.能不能找个人把我打晕20年阿 让我看看20年后这个狗疫情还在不在
从预告到正片真的是有被蕾蓓尔瘦了那么多惊讶到，倒也是符合电影里的角色设定。以另一种视角来演绎传统美式青春校园电影，有重返17岁的感觉但又多了很多包容感，有套路的撕逼但是实际角色们打心底里都还不错，虽然这个故事可以更长一点，但或许那也意味着drama变多反而少了这样轻松随意的生活感，整体是超过及格线的，希望她能有更多的戏路吧
继让三十岁的人演高中生以后，网飞终于开始让三十岁的人演三十岁的人扮演高中生了
虽然作为一部小鸡浪漫喜剧有点过长了，但是在这个年代还能看到轻松不用脑的电影不容易啊，Rebel减肥很成功，但是既然瘦下来了就不要用之前胖妹时候的演法了，表情看着怪怪的
差点半途而废。经典美式校园场面和回归题材都很老套。但鉴于饭没吃完，看到后面发现是青春教育片，虽说一切探讨浅尝辄止，但还是蛮鼓舞人心的。该说不说某种程度我的确很羡慕学校的包容度。
三分美国校园喜剧，非常瑞西威瑟彭斯。很多政治正确讽刺，以及很多政治正确。非常……圆滑的一个喜剧了。
男同导演来诠释的女性永远都那么用劲儿。一看便知，不过这都比一些傻屌自信男导演编剧诠释的好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
