Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
视觉美学其实没那么突出 因为那些长焦特写明显要你看的就是演员表演 可是！这是电影啊！表演再精彩也是要和镜头互动的……而且正方形构图本来就不太能体现电影美学。。。。
抽象的置景，抽象的配乐，抽象的摄影，抽象的剪辑，抽象的道具，目的就是让观众所有的焦点都聚集在角色身上，借助了一些舞台的调度，感受每一个角色的内心情感以及戏剧张力，电影里所有的一切都是为角色服务的，包括黑白，甚至环境音。这种影像探索初衷是好的，但实际成果如何还有待商榷，个人并不喜欢丹泽尔华盛顿这次的演出，特别是当他生气的时候设计的动作，佝偻着腰双手弯曲，看着特别不舒服。
对于互助小组里的来电还是更喜欢星运里的错
#第9th金帧2022奥斯卡专场
有事吗？这部比刻在你心底的名字评分低？好夸张……整体逻辑自洽，中间还是有戳人的点，镜头也很好看…我觉得算是中上了吧…是不是因为AIDS题材共情少呢…（所以影评有人说男主“无情”？我无语先…）（看完后马上下单了艾滋病检测试剂…）
最后，片尾的PPT一出来真是给我气笑了，偷懒不是这么偷的吧？
感觉两个主角不是特别来电
构图摄影不错
套用友邻评价Spielberg版西区故事：导演，没有东西拍的话可以不拍。以及这是在纪念碑谷？
形式主义，老派的拍法，但是《麦克白》看过太多版本了，这并不是最好的。
就是我看不懂，但是我很震撼的那种电影，光影美学非常上乘
不出意外的一句话都听不懂就不打分了。舞台感弄得挺唬人，但总觉得像是极简装逼版《300勇士》。
优点和缺点一样突出，构图摄影非常完美，更接近舞台剧式的表演则是一把双刃剑，一方面最大限度的还原了莎翁作品的的文学性，另一方面也最大限度的限制了作为电影作品存在的价值！
无惧，混乱，带着期待，搞砸一切，然后重新开始，青春最大的好处在于它的未知，成长的过程要是平淡无奇也挺没趣的，去找到最好的版本吧。
首先LeoFiat的nc戏比正片强太多太多了，
观看名著障碍症再次发作。。。只能当美术课了。。。
上次看是97版，15年法斯宾德版本女巫部分太无聊，毫无神秘性可言，本片女巫的几场戏已经值得五星。
这就是那种明明质量很高但是你却喜欢不起来的电影，一是受不了如此之多的黑人出现在莎翁剧里，厌恶这种无处不在，不知所云的政治正确；二是受不了丹泽尔·华盛顿这张正义满满的脸，他演不了麦克白这种正邪两面派的角色；三是感觉看了一场舞台剧，而不是一场电影，虽然太多的画面美轮美奂#2022奥斯卡阅片倒计时#
这种婚后生活可以拍1000集吗谢谢，俩人越来越自然越来越甜了，看了后面的花絮感觉小一好容易害羞，ja总是一脸淡定hhh
人在无助的时候最容易做傻事 但是经历过之后 才能真的长大 成熟 感谢生命中出现的那些个过客 都是彼此的消遣罢了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
