You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
后悔提前看了公众号的剧透 不然应该蛮精彩的
演技可以的，剧情悲伤真实又荒诞。一方面，案发时没人去深究真相，连枪械指纹、火药反应都略过没测。一方面，年轻的少女法盲深信自己抗了雷，以至于人生直接崩溃开局（二十多年没问问五岁误杀犯罪么）。不过现在美国有父亲从女儿五岁就开始教射击了，还有十五岁少年的生日礼物——少年款专用武器在黑五促销，共和党号召每个班里都来几个持枪的少年保护安全，民主党号召穿防弹衣上学。少年枪击的普法教育也在一个接着一个案件的发生中，越来越好。（她妹没失忆…就很暗黑了。）
感动是真的，悲喜是相通的，这才是最难得的东西。支持一把印度妇女。
太震撼了，又是印度常见qj题材，但却能不断翻出花来。感官刺激之外这个故事很需要人们反思，当一个平民以身试险，用犯罪制裁犯罪的时候，国家还能有救吗？
沉得住气，每一个铺陈的点都有回声，没有刻板形象也没有功能性人物，每一个人都是复杂又弧线完整的。casting也做得好啊，妹妹的养母，近年也是老演“妈妈”类角色，但是一个很高级的妈妈，最难忘是《拒绝再战》里的母亲形象了……桑德拉布洛克不用说，开场那张又丧又拗的脸，可以入备明年最佳女主了吧。
剧情真的不能细想，经不起推敲。不过这种电影本身也没打算让人琢磨故事，感觉就是为了在颁奖季推一推女一，不过现在看来应该是糊了…
天呐，太难过了！开头只知道奈娜是个很温柔的幼儿园老师，她在休息了三周后，回到幼儿园———绑架了16个孩子，这是为什么呢？在抽丝剥茧后才知道，印度每16分钟就有一个妇女被强奸。更令人震惊的是rapist近在眼前，总理和奈娜的会谈，奈娜只想帮助更多无助的、没有法律保护的女性。
刚开始挺好，但是一跟总理通话后，开始崩了，这就有点脱离现实了
就着最近的新闻，印度四男子强奸巨蜥，这片子值五星。
前面还在想，不至于杀人吧，后来道出实情才解释的通，她才5岁啊。最后没有言语的相拥，一切都释然了，情同母女的姐妹情。
唉看得好难过啊，想起前程似锦的女孩，我们都待在一个只能以暴制暴的社会里。
其他的英雄主义我个人很不喜欢，但这个很喜欢。
坚决抵制废除死刑
演员都挺好的！！！！！可这剧情？我这个法盲只想知道5岁孩童走火过失杀人，到底算谁的责任？怎么判？
前半段悬念做得不错的，看完我真觉得我们没资格嘲笑印度。
奈娜真是太棒了，逼出政要的行为真是个好主意，不過人家印度政府在意兒童生命，才肯出面。比如在某國，綁架16個兒童？就算把全國兒童綁架了又如何？愛誰誰！結局的一行字太可怕了。ps女主和陳凱琳傻傻分不清，原來陳凱琳是印度人
没有歌舞，两小时没有尿点，印度片越来越多好片了。虽然还是逃不开一些套路，例如罪犯之所以成为片中罪犯，是因为有冤要诉。近年这套路真的有点多。
还凑合吧！说实话印度电影总是拍这么长真没必要，乏了。
如果没那么多慢镜头回放就能更好了！这手法现在实在太过时了………
后面被扣押的司机是强奸犯的设计很巧妙。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
